Actor Dhanush has expressed robust criticism over the AI-altered re-release of his 2013 movie Raanjhanaa, calling the brand new ending a distortion of the unique story and a violation of inventive integrity. The re-released model, titled Ambikapathy, is being screened in Tamil Nadu and reportedly options an artificially generated alternate climax the place the lead characters reunite; a stark departure from the movie’s authentic tragic ending.
Taking to social media, Dhanush wrote, “This isn’t the movie I dedicated to 12 years in the past.” In a proper assertion, he added, “The re-release of Raanjhanaa with an AI-altered climax has utterly disturbed me. This alternate ending has stripped the movie of its very soul… The usage of AI to change movies or content material is a deeply regarding precedent for each artwork and artists.”
For the love of cinema pic.twitter.com/VfwxMAdfoM
— Dhanush (@dhanushkraja) August 3, 2025
He additional urged the necessity for stricter laws round such practices, warning that it threatens the integrity of storytelling and the legacy of cinema.
Director Aanand L Rai additionally distances himself
The movie’s director, Aanand L Rai, additionally posted on Instagram expressing disappointment over the unauthorised modification. “To observe Raanjhanaa, a movie born out of care, battle, collaboration, and artistic threat, be altered, repackaged, and re-released with out my data or consent has been nothing wanting devastating,” Rai wrote.
Although disheartened, the filmmaker additionally acknowledged the outpouring of assist from the inventive neighborhood: “It has jogged my memory of what Raanjhanaa stood for within the first place; connection, braveness, and fact.”
Who owns Raanjhanaa, and what’s Eros’s stand?
The unique movie, starring Dhanush and Sonam Kapoor, was produced by Eros Worldwide, which continues to carry the rights to the title and its regional launch model, Ambikapathy. To date, Eros has not launched any official assertion on the controversy surrounding the AI-generated modifications or the filmmakers’ objections.
This incident provides to a rising world debate across the moral and artistic implications of utilizing AI in filmmaking, particularly in altering completed works with out the consent of authentic creators.
With each lead actor and director publicly distancing themselves from the re-release, the backlash may reignite conversations about how legacy movies are dealt with within the age of synthetic intelligence and whether or not consent from creators ought to be non-negotiable.
Written with the View : afaqs
